We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Focal infection theory and its acceptance and discreditation
- Focal infection theory is the historical concept that many chronic diseases are caused by localised infections.
- Focal infections are often asymptomatic and cause disease elsewhere in the host.
- The theory explained virtually all diseases, including arthritis, atherosclerosis, cancer, and mental illnesses.
- Focal infection theory was widely accepted in medicine by the 1920s.
- Focal infection theory was discredited in the 1940s due to research attacks that proved its falsity.
- Dental restorations and endodontic therapy became favored again in mainstream dentistry and medicine.
Alleged foci of infection
- Alleged foci of infection included the appendix, urinary bladder, gall bladder, kidney, liver, prostate, and nasal sinuses.
- Dental decay, infected tonsils, dental restorations, and endodontically treated teeth were blamed as foci of infection.
- Tonsillectomies and tooth extractions were popular approaches to treat or prevent diverse diseases.
Untreated endodontic disease and alternative perspectives
- Untreated endodontic disease retained mainstream recognition as fostering systemic disease.
- Alternative medicine and biological dentistry continued highlighting dental treatments as foci of infection causing chronic and systemic diseases.
- Mainstream recognition of focal infection is endocarditis, if oral bacteria enter the blood and infect the heart.
- Scientific evidence supporting general relevance of focal infections remained slim.
- Evolved understandings of disease mechanisms established a third possible mechanism—metastasis of infection, metastatic toxic injury, and metastatic immunologic injury.
Renewed attention to dental infections
- Dental infections are widespread and significant contributors to systemic diseases.
- Mainstream attention is on ordinary periodontal disease, not on hypotheses of stealth infections via dental treatment.
- Some doubts were renewed in the 1990s by conventional dentistry's critics.
- Dentistry scholars maintain that endodontic therapy can be performed without creating focal infections.
- Dental infections have gained renewed attention in recent years.
Rise and popularity (1890s–1930s)
- Focal infection theory appeared in modern medicine in 1877.
- The breakthrough by Robert Koch in 1882 premised the modern principle of focal infection.
- In 1890, German dentist Willoughby D Miller attributed oral and extraoral diseases to infections.
- Miller identified bacteria in tooth pulp samples in 1894 and advised root canal therapy.
- Ancient and folk concepts found new outlet in medical bacteriology, a pillar of the new scientific medicine.